الاختلاف في دلالة الأمر على الفور وآثاره الفقهية دراسة نظرية تطبيقية
No Thumbnail Available
Date
2015
Authors
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
University of Eloued-جامعة الوادي
Abstract
In this research, I addressed one of the important issues of the
demand about which scholar views on its significance differed and its
effects on fiqh. The research is composed of two chapters, the first
one is theoretical, in which I presented the scholar school of thoughts
about whether the demand requires immediate action or no and their
evidences. The second one is practical chapter in which I presented
some of the demand affections on fiqh which resulted by the
difference of scholar views on its significance.
The scholar views differs about whether the demand requires
immediate action or no, some of them take the safe side which is the
demand requires immediate action at the time it happens with no
late. Any late led to wrongdoing.
By contrast, other scholars take the wide side which is the
demand does not require immediate action and late doing is possible
as far as in its limited time.
This difference affects many issues in Fiqh. I presented some of
these issues in detail. I showed, in the conclusion, the main results I
reached with some important recommendations
Description
مذكرة ماستر
Keywords
الاختلاف في دلالة / الأمر على الفور/ّ آثاره الفقهية, The difference in the significance of / the matter is immediate / its jurisprudential effects