Address of the intervention: The human right to understand expert science: the standard of modernity of the law?

Abstract

Two decades later, participatory democracy emerged in public law, posing the need for the law to be written by demanding the administration of truth, and the words of the law itself can no longer be tolerated in today's society except through a genuine discourse. The law becomes the element that increases the performance of an evidentiary group to produce facts. Inference here with the science where the law is united by science or mingling through the resort to objectivity, which is the fruit of scientific experience to bring the legal system to the system of interpretation of honest and legitimate, the law to provide models and systems in the form of a set of rules and answers adapted to this extent or that with the development Science . For example, the use of DNA in the criminal justice process gradually evolved to less than 20 years, the least controversial scientific material in criminal justice to prove and understand the physical evidence of the crime scene. The use of lab evidence has grown in scientific innovations and practical applications. The analysis of the PC and mobile phone segments has become a physical guide to the suspect's cybercrime, giving the prestige and prestige of science and technology to understand And proof of physical evidence